Research finds carbon dating flawed
On your side you have the crackpot answersingenesis website, and you have the Discovery Institute activists and a couple of other minor activist groups, and not one single legitimate scientific body, not one recognized International or National body dedicated to general science.
The Critical Research Failure trope as used in popular culture. Face it, accept it - we view the facts through coloured glasses - be they humanist or creationist-coloured. The From a letter Einstein wrote in English, dated 24 March You're asking for a rational response and hoping you don't get one?
by Gerald A. Aardsma, Ph.D.
Before his current research at. No one really relies on carbon isotopes for anything, except sometimes methane hydrate release. This will not affect geological dating at all. As said in wikipedia, it is only truly applicable "other things being equal. There are two characteristics of the instrumental research finds carbon dating flawed of radiocarbon which, if the lay observer is unaware, could easily lead to such an idea.
Proclaiming Scientific Truth in Creation www. However they aren't so deeply rooted in their faith that they're not able to make a nice compromise between reality and fantasy. What does it mean to be poor in Hong Kong? The title is exceedingly confusing.
Radiocarbon holds unique potential for the student of earth history who adheres to a recent creation. The animals build their bodies out of that "old" carbon in their food.
The case for fraud in the radiocarbon dating of the Turin Shroud 1: It's been 2 years now! It seems to me like a very important finding.
So when you see more 13C in some sediment you know that plants are growing faster.